KMID : 0986720170250020079
|
|
Korean Journal of Medicine and Law 2017 Volume.25 No. 2 p.79 ~ p.106
|
|
Medical Consideration for Industrial Accident Compensation and Disability Assessment in Urology - Focusing on the analysis of recent cases -
|
|
Park Kyung-Kgi
Huh Hee-Jae
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
Although the relationship between the patient and the doctor is a legal contraction, doctor is making a great effort to cure the disease with the best of the patient"s disease. In the medical practice, complications related to treatment occur, resulting in obstacles to the patient, which are increasingly being compensated for the disability. The compensation system for industrial accidents among the compensation system in Korea is a system in which the system has been established along with the economic growth in Korea and a system for compensating for the obstacles that occur during the work of the workers. Disability can be temporary or permanent due to damage during work, and reimbursement can also have a significant impact on patients and companies in the event of a permanent disability. Compensation takes physical defects as priority, and the degree of impairment is weak against the functional impairment of organs. In each hospital, modifications are made in consideration of the patient"s name and age through forms such as reimbursement-related cost estimates and medical certificate of injury, so that estimates are different for each hospital even for the same specialized courses.
This study examines the difference between the judgments of damages related to industrial accidents and the medical indemnification standards that should be considered at the medical field. In many cases, when an industrial accident is confined to the urology area, a large number of bladder dysfunction and male sexual dysfunction become a problem. In the case of incontinence, which is a problem of the quality of life, it is not possible to take into consideration the grade or to provide objective data to identify the subjective symptoms such as incontinence. There is a more objective and predictable compensation system using the guideline, so it would be better to reduce time and economic waste to each other in patients and compensating organizations.
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
Industrial Accidents, impairment, Urology, Medical Litigation, Disability Assessment
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|
|